When my dad needed to have his flat roof rebuilt to improve rain drainage he had a particular vision in mind (as most handyman dads do). To explore his options, he called several local builders in for estimates.
The first builder presented a solution that didn't align with my dad's initial plan, and as a result, he was ignored.
Surprisingly, the second builder proposed the exact same solution as the first, leading to a similar response from my dad - disapproval and dismissal.
The third and fourth builders - without any knowledge of the previous suggestions - coincidentally echoed the same solutions, which, unsurprisingly, failed to win my dad's favour.
However, the fifth builder finally presented the solution my dad had been hoping for all along, and he decided to move forward with them.
Now, it would certainly add more drama to my story if I could tell you that the roof had dramatically caved in, but alas, that would be a fabrication (at least for now - who knows what the future might bring!)
I have often emphasised the perils of disregarding expert advice, but this situation takes it to another level. It's akin to seeking expert guidance, but only accepting someone as a "true" expert when their viewpoint aligns with our non-expert expectations.
Imagine if four doctors warned you that taking a blue tablet would have fatal consequences (despite your love for the colour blue). Would you still choose to take it if a fifth doctor assured you that they also adore the colour blue and that you would be perfectly fine?
In conclusion, avoid flat roofs (if possible), exercise caution when it comes to taking unfamiliar medication, and perhaps most importantly, refrain from seeking validation solely from experts who confirm our preconceived notions.
Remember: making informed decisions involves striking a balance between expert advice and open-mindedness.
Good luck when the storms arrive.